I’m beginning to think that democrats hate being in power. I’ve come to this conclusion because every time they have power, they end up shooting themselves in the face. It’s as if they are on a quail hunting trip with our former vice president. Honestly it’s getting to the point where the only explanation is that democrats secretly fear the responsibility required of being in charge and in control and purposely sabotage themselves in order to go back to being the people that talk tough but don’t follow through. Case in point, House of Representatives member Charlie Rangel. Charlie Rangel is the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. The Ways and Means Committee, among other things, writes tax codes and laws. Rangel currently faces allegations of failure to pay taxes, neglecting to report assets and certain income and a few other things. In one claim, he reportedly “forgot” that he had $500,000 sitting in a checking account. Now I don’t know about you, but when I find an extra $50 laying around…I’m aware of that. No one….NO ONE forgets they have half a million dollars laying around. Anyway…
Common sense tells me that if Rangel can’t get his own taxes, income and assets squared away, maybe he shouldn’t be Chairman of the committee that writes legistlation on taxes. I’m just saying. Seems like a no brainer to me. And I’m not alone. Richard Cohen wrote this in the Washington Post:
There is something wrong with Charlie Rangel. Either he did not notice that he was worth about twice as much as he said he was — which is downright worrisome in a congressional leader — or he thinks that he’s above the law, which is downright worrisome in a congressional leader.
I think we can all agree with that. Whether this was all a mistake or a malicious attempt by Rangel to avoid the laws he himself created, enough questions exist to say “Hey Charlie, maybe you should step down.”
So that makes it all the more confusing that house democrats voted against a measure that would have removed Rangel from his chairman position while he was undergoing this ethics violation. *sigh*. Okay, first things first. Yes I’m aware that republicans are casting stones when they themselves are just as dirty as Rangel. That’s beside the point. The “But they do it too” excuse doesn’t work with me for republicans so it doesn’t work with me for democrats. Secondly, this undermines the democrats position on being in charge and “cleaning up” the corruption. You’re allowing a guy who is chairmen of a committee that WRITES the tax laws to stay chairman even though he has clearly cheated on his taxes. Come on. I know that the Congressional Black Caucus wants to support their own because not too many black congressmen chair committees, but I would rather not have an African American committee chairmen or chairwoman than have one who is under ethic investigation. You can’t spend the last 8 years complaining about how republicans are corrupt and take advantage of the situation and then when you are in power, do the same ‘turning a blind eye’ policy that they did. That makes you a hypocrite.
I can’t be the only one that sees this has a problem for Democrats down the line. Pelosi is basically undercutting her own position, which was to root out corruption, by allowing Rangel to stay. It’s not like they were trying to kick him out of the committee, or kick him out of Congress (both I think should be appropriate though), they just wanted him to not be chairmen. That makes sense. Yes, I know there is all kinds of corruption and backhanded deals going on in Congress. But I’m sorry, when you are the chairmen of the committee, you have to be held accountable. Again, this is why we need to change the law on term limits for Congress. Senators and House of Representative members in “safe” districts are in essence elected for a life time position. Charlie Rangel’s been in office for well over 30 years. There’s a reason why the President can only serve 2 consecutive terms. Putting someone in a position of power for that long opens them up to corruption or even just getting too comfortable and not really keeping up with the times. Seriously, how ridiculous is it that these old men can amass all this power through back door deals over 30 years and still have the audacity to claim they are for the people. In that respect the system is broken. You have people who are 70 – 80 years old trying to regulate the Internet. They don’t even know how to turn their own computers on but they are going to write legislation for it? Come on. Until we make changes to that, the Charlie Rangel’s of Congress will continue to get over on us, the American people. Its part arrogance on Rangel’s part and part idiocy on behalf of each democrat that voted “No” on forcing him to step down. This man is either incompetent or unethical that much is certain. Either way, he shouldn’t be heading the chair of a committee writing tax laws when he doesn’t even know how to read his own bank statements. Just more absurdities brought to us by the United States Congress.













