Why I Can’t Mess With the Overly Religious

trex

To put it bluntly, they are either stupid or mindless drones. First off, I’m not an atheist. I believe in God. If you were going to throw me into one of the defined “religions”, it would have to be Christianity. However, I’m not a religious person. I can’t stand “religion”. Not only does religion seem to be the cause of about 90% of the conflicts in the world, but to me it seems to just be a tool used by those in power to maintain their power. If you have a problem with that statement I suggest you first, calm down, then I want you to go research some of the conflicts in the world and some of the most ruthless leaders in history and see what I mean. I’ll be fair. Part of my problem with religion is that I don’t trust human beings. We lie. It’s part of our nature. Sometimes we don’t even realize we are doing it because we have become so blinded by our position on something, that we really think what we are doing is right. This small fact leads to the basis of my conflict with the overly religious. I simply have a hard time believing anything anyone says. That issue is futher complicated with the fact that those that argue with religious people know that they always invoke two things when their backs are up against a wall in an argument: Faith and The Bible. Like a cornered wildcat, you count on them to start hurling quotes from the Bible when they are faced with facts and inconsistencies. It reminds me how when you were little and playing “Super Hero” with your friend how they would always make up powers to compete with yours. So if you were play fighting and you had the power of flight and they had super strength and you pretend to fly away, all of the sudden they would say they could do that too. I’m not saying that faith isn’t the answer sometimes, however, God also gave us common sense (well, most of us anyway) and I think God would like us to use it some times.

Now before I go into what caused me to write this article, I want to say that when I say I don’t take everything in the Bible literally, that is not an attack against God. Some people always get up in arms and feel a need to come up with some elaborate excuse as to why I am disgracing God when I say that. The problem is that people always say that the Bible is the word of God and therefore it cannot be wrong. That would be fine if the Bible was comprised of the actual words from God, word for word. However, the Bible has been transcribed and translated by man, and while God is perfect, man is far from it. I can barely type my own words in this article without misspellings, exaggerating, or just plain leaving things out. In elementary school we played this game. It was called ‘telephone’. The 15 students would sit down in a line and the teacher would whisper a phrase into the ear of one of the kids and tell them to pass it along. The objective would be to see if the message would get all the way to end exactly as it was given at first. By the time it got to the last person, the phrase “Jimmy, pass this message along” became “Jimmy farted in Timmy’s cereal.” If you’ve ever written a paper for a history class you know that you don’t rely on one reference source, but on many. Many religious zealots will completely ignore known facts and evidence and say “well the Bible says it” with nothing to back themselves up. When confronted with those facts, they’ll say the overused “Well, if you had faith, you would know it was true” which is a complete cop out. I’m not saying that the things written about in the Bible are false, I just think that due to different people translating and trying to recall it has had some things exaggerated a little. That’s no knock against God, it just means that his humble servants are, human…meaning, we make mistakes. Many people use their pastor or minister as their other source, and let me tell you, most pastors/ministers/priests are about as reliable as using a papier-mâché umbrella during a hurricane. Again, they are human too…therefore unlike God, they are not infallible.

This article idea all started with the “Dinosaur problem” when it comes to creationists explaining why a literal translation of the Bible is correct. See, if you say that the Earth was created in 7 days and that Adam had domain over all beasts, that means 2 things: 1. Dinosaurs are not as old as their fossils say they are and 2. Dinosaurs and humans lived amongst each other at the same time. I’ve had plenty of arguments where people tried to explain it to me and let me say that I have a better time believing those people that claim to be abducted by aliens. Then I read this article: T Rex Ate Coconuts. Actually, before reading that article, I flipped to Fox News in the morning (I like to see how the other side thinks sometimes). They were talking to this dude, Ken Ham (He looks like Abraham Lincoln reincarnated), who is opening a Creationist Museum in Kentucky. Now, I have no problem with people trying to express their views, even if they are different from me. However, to me, a museum is a place of fact, not fiction. After doing a search on the museum and reading the article above, it is obvious to me that someone has read one too many Dinotopia books. I started doing my research and realized that while the person that wrote the article wasn’t 100% accurate in describing the museum, Ken Ham (the creator of the museum) actually believes that all dinosaurs were plant eaters. Seriously, think about how absurd that sounds. A two story tall T. Rex, with menacing teeth and sleek predator body…eating bananas and apples, maybe munching on some tall grass. Even if they did use their teeth for eating coconuts, that’s a little bit of overkill…much like killing ants with a sledge hammer. Using the overly religious folk’s own argument, God doesn’t make mistakes…so why would he create a perfect killing machine if it was only going to eat coconuts? Ken Ham actually has a “rebuttal” of the article. I have the word “rebuttal” in quotes because when you read his responses, it’s not really a rebuttal at all. As a matter of fact, he pretty much confirms what the person that wrote the article said. The other article had minor mistakes in it. Like there aren’t any museum guides…just guest relations personnel. Yeah, big difference there buddy. My favorite though is how he says that the children aren’t playing amongst the T. Rex’s but just “near” them and that the dinosaurs are looking in the other direction. Now, I don’t know about you, but if I was to for some unknown reason have a display with children and T. Rex’s in close proximity to one another, regardless if the dinosaurs were looking in their direction or not, if the children and T. Rex’s were within eyesight of one another the children would be running away with the look of horror on their faces.

Now I know someone’s going to come in here and say that people like Mr. Ham (I can’t even take him serious with a name like that) are in the minority and are just extreme nut cases. Oh no, you’re not going to get away with that one. Dude got $25 million to open up this museum. There are plenty of people out there that support what he is doing. You read that correctly. There are plenty of people out there that not only think that dinosaurs walked the earth with humans but that the Earth is only is only around 6 to 10 thousand years old. Sadly, in recent years I’ve had to battle my mother over this issue. It is especially troubling because she’s a science teacher and she’s the one that taught me about evolution when I was little. As a side note, I always find it funny when people say they don’t believe in evolution because “I didn’t evolve from a monkey”, like the human race has always been the pinnacle of civilized society. A few centuries ago it was common place not to take a bath for weeks. We used to live in caves. Is it really that much of a stretch? Again, use the common sense God gave you. Remember, a few centuries ago people used to think that the Earth was the center of the universe and that the world was flat. Again, they used the Bible to back up their claims. See a pattern here?

Let me close by saying that people that argue that the Bible has to be taken as a literal translation are completely missing the point. Look, most people admit that time is a little different in the Bible. One day in the Bible doesn’t translate to one 24-hour day in our time. Come on, you know someone took some “creative liberty” with that. Creating the Earth in 7 days seems a lot more exciting and makes for a better story than creating it in 4.5 Billion years. However, arguing the intricate details is not only pointless but totally irrelevant. Does the fact that it took God 4.5 Billion years of our time to create the Earth make the feat any less amazing? When’s the last time you created a universe, planet, and ecosystem? It takes 9 months alone for a fetus to develop. If God didn’t create Adam and Eve until after the dinosaurs died off, does that turn our whole belief system upside down? Of course not. Its time people started reading between the lines and understanding the deeper meaning instead of just skimming the top and taking everything at face value. Wake up people. Wake up.

Share with your friends:
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • De.lirio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Comments

  1. WG says:

    Actually, fetal development takes 9 months.  Conception takes anywhere from a few seconds to a few hours – depending on you and your partners stamina.

  2. Kriss says:

    See, that's what happens when you try to proof read an intelligent post at 2 am in the morning.  Thanks for the catch.

  3. Chris A. says:

    I often say I interpret the Bible liberally… and the Constitution literally.  If you're in the mood for something that'll knock your socks off watch this –> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnxQiCg9qpg

  4. Anonymous says:

    Time has not always been with relation to the roation of the earth. Animals were created before humans. Man could rule over all beasts but that doesnt mean all beasts survived until Man was created. The is clearly a middle ground to stand on. I dont think either extreme side is right.

  5. WG says:

    Being that the Earth's center of gravity and distance of rotation from the Sun has not changed, then the only reason that time way back when doesnt match with time nowadays can only be due to a change in the earths radius (diameter).  Radius is inversely proportional to rotational velocity so as the Earth gets bigger, the rotation gets slower and the days get longer (according to Physics 122).  Since the Earth was small at first, that means the days were also shorter.  Where I was going with this point, I cant remember, but I just thought that I would post it to give people another thing to think about….

  6. Kriss says:

    Geez Chris.  I just watched that video and I feel like I just got dumber.  I can't believe it….

  7. Kriss says:

    Here is a video of the actual museum they are buiding in Kentucky:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wzjjxi7f0Oc&mode=related&search=

    You can't tell me these people are sane.     

  8. Jennifer says:

    What's funny is, many of these are likely the same people that read that Jesus had "hair of wool" and "skin of bronze", but will tell you that without a doubt, the pictures of a lily white Jesus with straight hair are an accurate depiction.

  9. Minister Fred Hatche says:

    "Let me close by saying that people that argue that the Bible has to be taken as a literal translation are completely missing the point. Look, most people admit that time is a little different in the Bible. One day in the Bible doesn’t translate to one 24-hour day in our time."

     Find out what Jesus said about a day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are no Christian. If anyone were to throw you into a category, you suppose it would be Christianity. No true believer would simply say that he can be lumped into believing that Christ is God the Savior. You are no different than King Agrippa's statement concerning Christianity and his disdain for it.

  10. Kriss says:

    I'll give it to you.  You are the King of taking one part and twisting it the way you want it to appear.  Did you read the rest of that sentence?  The rest said that it doesn't matter if it's a 24 hour day or not.  The point is, God did something none of us could do.  That is what makes it special. 

  11. A.S. says:

    You just got CHASTISED in a blog by a “minister.” This is laughable. Hatcher… what is your motivation? So not only do you try to pursuade others from joinng organizations who ‘s ultimate goal is service to mankind but dare to JUDGE others by the material they post in a blog! What does Jesus say about judgement? And the sad part is people are listening to you. You should be ashamed. And should be using your influence for some greater good. People cannot even have a dialogue about belief without being attacked by the self righteous.

  12. Anonymous says:

    God could have created the Universe in 7 days, but made it look older just to throw off the unfaithful.  A writer doesn’t generally start off with characters who are children, then grow them up in the storyline just so that the characters will be perceived as having been "developed" over time.

     

  13. Chris A. says:

    “God could have created the Universe in 7 days, but made it look older just to throw off the unfaithful. A writer doesn’t generally start off with characters who are children, then grow them up in the storyline just so that the characters will be perceived as having been “developed” over time.”

    With that in mind, so then did God also trick us by creating (or allowing us to create) carbon-dating machines or altering the decay time of carbon to throw off the unfaithful? Why is it that creationists or those who believe in “intelligent-design” cannot come to terms with the fossil record? Do you believe these scientists to be agents of the Devil sent to deceive you? I just don’t understand why the faithful can’t find some middle ground on hard-science.

    In fact, planes fly because Angels carry them. The internal combustion engine only runs because God implanted the Earth with a *finite* amount of fossil fuels. And humans have no effect on global warming because God is using it as a tool of the Apocalypse. Let’s throw out every scientific fact and reasonable argument ever generated… I prefer the Dark Ages anyways.

  14. Among the millions of fossils on record, NOT ONE SINGLE BONE SHOWS A TRANSITIONAL PHASE. The fossil record and science is very clear on one thing, LIFE CAN ONLY COME FORM THAT WHICH IS ALREADY LIVING. In short, evolutionists have no “leg bone” to stand on……….LOL!!!!! So I have come to terms with the fossil record, just not the lying ones we see in textbooks today. Nebraska Man and Lucy……….Someone please explain why these lies are still taught in the classrooms today?

  15. Cliff says:

    As a anthropology/chemistry major/minor I’ll handle this last comment by our dear minister. The fossil record that we have today is incomplete due to several factors. For hundreds of years fossils were thrown out, damaged and/or destroyed due to the process that is civilization. New is built is on top of old and many cities are built on top of what could have been archaeological. Another important factor is that fossilization only occurs in certain areas; namely areas with plenty of water. Without mud bodies and structures would have decomposed too quickly for the process to take place. This also means that the majority of the record that we have are of organisms that have died where there were bodies of water. In human evolution this means we’re seeing species or cultures that spent a greater amount of time near water. Early homonids species that spent less time around water would have a much lower chance of being found in the fossil record. Thirdly onto your misconception of a transitional phase. Evolution takes place over a variety of ways. Mutations in the genome affecting physiological differences can appear overnight. You also overlooked something that any logical person would see. Fossils only show the bones. You have no way of comparing DNA or internal structures of the organisms. Only comparing skeletal structure is foolish. Suppose somebody tried to compare the bones of an NBA player and somebody with dwarfism. Somebody might come to the conclusion that they’re different species. The same thing could have and has been done in the archeological community. Frankly I could go on and on about this subject but I have other things I need to be doing now.